The palate is the roof of the mouth that separates the oral and nasal cavities as well as the nasopharynx. It is arched and lined with oral mucosa, which has mucus producing glands on it known as the palatine glands. There are two parts to the palate – hard and soft. The hard palate lies more anteriorly (in front) while the soft palate lies posterior to it (at the back).
Hard Palate
Best Answer: maybe u got mouth ulcer that causes jaundice. Perhaps, you body is constantly breaking down old red blood cells (RBC’s/erythrocytes) when these cells reach the end of its lifespan in the circulation (approximately 120 days) or become damaged. The RBC’s are renewed by the maturation of hematopoietic stem cells found in.
The hard palate is the fixed anterior two-thirds of the palate that is formed by the palatal processes of the maxillae and horizontal plates of the palantine bones. It is arched (concave) and creates a vault within the oral cavity that is mostly filled by the tongue. The depression running on the midline of the hard palate is known as the incisive fossa. Numerous canals allows the nasopalatine nerves to pass through from the nose. Other foramina allow for the entry of the greater and lesser palatine nerves and vessels.
Soft Palate
The soft palate is the flexible, posterior one-third of the palate from which the uvula hangs. It is largely muscular and has no bone in it. It has a thicker aponeurotic part anteriorly which attaches to the posterior part of the hard palate. The posterior part of the soft palate is thinner and composed mainly of muscle.
There are five muscles of the soft palate :
- Tensor veli palatini
- Levator veli palatini
- Palatoglossus
- Palatopharyngeus
- Musculus uvulae
All of these muscles are innervated by the pharyngeal nerve plexus (pharyngeal branch of vagus nerve CN X), except for the tensor veli palatini which is supplied by the medial pteyrgoid nerve via the otic ganlion.
These muscles are able to move the soft palate in different positions to perform various functions. When the soft palate is raised superiorly, it blocks the nasopharynx thereby preventing food and drink that are passing into the pharynx from entering the nasal cavity. When it moves inferiorly, it block the passage into the oral cavity so that air passing out of the lungs passes out through the nose. By tensing the muscles during eating, food can be compressed and pushed down into the throat when swallowing.
Blood Supply to the Palate
Arterial blood is supplied via the greater and lesser palatine arteries. The veins of the palate join the pterygoid venous plexus.
Nerve Supply to the Palate
Branches from the pterygopalatine ganglion (branches of maxillary nerve) supplies the sensory innervation to the palate. Nasopalatine and greater palatine nerves supply the hard palate while the lesser palatine nerves supply the soft palate.
Published online 2014 Sep 17. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.193
PMID: 25279339
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Purpose
The present study was aimed to investigate the variation of soft palate morphology in different age and gender groups. The correlations of radiographic velar length (VL), velar width (VW), pharyngeal depth (PD), and Need's ratio with soft palate variants were also studied in the North Indian subpopulation.
Materials and Methods
The study sample consisted of 300 subjects aged between 15 and 45 (mean: 31.32) years. The velar morphology on lateral cephalograms was examined and grouped into six types. The results obtained were subjected to a statistical analysis to find the correlation between variants of the soft palate with gender and different age groups.
Results
The most frequent type of soft palate was leaf shaped (48.7%), and the least common was crook shaped (3.0%) among both the genders and various age groups, showing a significant correlation. The mean VL, VW, and PD values were significantly higher in males and significantly correlated with the types of soft palate. A significant correlation was observed between the mean VL, VW, PD, and Need's ratio with various age groups, showing an inconsistent pattern with an increase in age. The types of soft palate, gender, and Need's ratio were also significantly correlated, with an overall higher mean value of the Need's ratio among female subjects and the S-shaped soft palate.
![Is A Yellow Soft Palate Normal Is A Yellow Soft Palate Normal](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125825897/196570161.png)
Conclusion
The knowledge of a varied spectrum of velar morphology and the variants of the soft palate help in a better understanding of the velopharyngeal closure and craniofacial anomalies.
Keywords: Radiography, Morphology, Soft Palate, Analysis
Introduction
The soft palate is the posterior fibro-muscular part of the palate that is attached to the posterior edge of the hard palate. It participates in velopharyngeal closure, which is related to the normal functions of sucking, swallowing, and pronunciation.2 Soft palate dysfunctions are frequently seen in cleft lip and palate patients, enlarged adenoids, obstructive sleep apnea, poorly retained maxillary denture and skeletal craniofacial malocclusion.,2 The palate is formed by the fusion of three components, namely two palatal processes and the primitive palate, which is formed by the frontonasal process. At a later stage, the mesoderm in the palate undergoes intramembranous ossification to form the hard palate. However, the ossification does not extend into the most posterior portion, which remains as the soft palate.3 There have been studies on the dimensional analysis of the soft palate morphology and its surrounding structures, but little attention has been paid to the varied soft palate morphology and configuration. You et al classified the soft palate into six morphological types (Type 1: leaf shaped; Type 2: rat tail; Type 3: butt like; Type 4: straight line; Type 5: S-shaped, and Type 6: crook shaped) by observing the image of the velum on lateral cephalograms.
Pepin et al found that the 'hooked or S-shaped' appearance of the soft palate in awake patients indicated a high risk of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Previous reports elucidated that the relationship between velar length (VL) and pharyngeal depth (PD) can be used to assess the velopharyngeal function. The ratio of PD to VL (PD/VL) was termed Need's ratio. Subtelny first reported that the Need's ratio ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 in normal subjects, and if it was greater than 0.7, the condition demonstrated a risk of velopharyngeal incompetency (VPI). Studies reported that this ratio was of prime importance in speech resonance and there was a significant correlation between craniofacial growth changes and changes in resonance during puberty that might be influenced by both dentofacial orthopedics and maxillary surgery., Further, the variability of Need's ratio measurements might possibly be related to the variation in adenoidal health conditions at various ages. Haapanen et al reported that 27% of cleft lip and palate patients who underwent maxillary advancement surgery showed a reduced velopharyngeal function; they explained this situation by the advancement of the posterior border of the hard palate as a result of maxillary advancement.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the variation of the soft palate on lateral cephalograms in different age and gender groups, and to find its correlation with the Need's ratio in the North Indian subpopulation. The radiographic velar length (VL), velar width (VW), and pharyngeal depth (PD) in different morphological velar types, age groups, and gender were also studied.
Materials and Methods
Three hundred digital lateral cephalograms were randomly selected from daily outpatients visiting the department of oral medicine and radiology from January to March 2013, requiring this radiograph for a diagnostic purpose. Informed written consent was obtained from each subject, and ethical clearance was obtained from the hospital's Institutional Ethics Committee (FSDCRI/IEC/2013/009; dated: 10.08.2013).
Inclusion criteria: Lateral cephalograms of the patients within the age range of 15-45 (mean: 31.32) years, having a normal speech function were included in the study. The 300 study subjects were equally divided into six age groups (n=50) (Group 1: 15-20 (mean: 18.32) years, Group 2: 20-25 (mean: 22.98) years, Group 3: 25-30 (mean: 29.30) years, Group 4: 30-35 (mean: 33.92) years, Group 5: 35-40 (mean: 39.06) years, and Group 6: 40-45 (mean: 44.35) years.
Exclusion criteria: Radiographs of patients with a history of cleft palate, systemic diseases, syndromes, or fracture of the head and neck were excluded from the study.
A lateral cephalometric analysis was performed to evaluate the velar and pharyngeal morphology as it is a relatively inexpensive method and provides a good assessment of the soft-tissue elements. All the lateral cephalograms were taken with the patients standing upright in a natural head position and were instructed to contact their molars and breathe through their nose (Fig. 1), so as to allow the same observation of the mobile sites of the soft palate and the upper airway, by one trained radiographer using the same digital radiographic machine (Kodak 8000C, Carestream Health Inc., Rochester, NY). A tube potential of 82 kV, a tube current of 10 mA, and an exposure time of 500 ms were used to optimize the contrast of the digital images. The digital radiographs were processed and viewed by using Kodak dental imaging software, version 6.12.24.0 (Carestream Health Inc., Rochester, NY, USA).
Lateral cephalograms are taken with a patient standing upright in the natural head position. The patient is instructed to contact his/her molars and breathe through his/her nose.
All the radiographs were analyzed and categorized into six types according to the soft palate morphology by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist (Fig. 2). The VL was evaluated by measuring the linear distance from the posterior nasal spine to the tip of the uvula of the resting soft palate. The VW measurement was taken at the thickest section of the velum. The PD was noted as a linear distance from the posterior surface of the nasal spine marker to the posterior pharyngeal wall along the palatal plane. The measurements were carried out for each digital radiograph, saved in a JPG file format using Kodak software (Fig. 3), twice by the same examiner, and the obtained mean value was considered. The Need's ratio was calculated for all the subjects by the division of PD by VL, obtained at a resting position.
Various velar morphologies are seen on lateral cephalograms. A. Type 1 'leaf-shaped' soft palate, B. Type 2 'rat-tail-shaped' soft palate, C. Type 3 'butt-like' soft palate, D. Type 4 'straight-line' soft palate, E. Type 5 'S-shaped' soft palate, and F. Type 6 'crook-shaped' soft palate.
Measurements are taken on a digital lateral cephalogram using software.
All the collected data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 Data Editor software (Microsoft Corporation Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A cross-tab was done by dividing the subjects into six age groups to compare with the types of soft palate, mean VL, VW, PD, and Need's ratio. The statistical correlation was also evaluated between morphological types and variants of the soft palate with both the genders. Pearson's correlation and t-test (2-tailed) were used to evaluate the relationship among variables in the cross-tabs.
Results
The most frequent morphological velar type among 300 subjects was type 1 (48.7%), followed by type 2 (31.0%), type 4 (8.7%), type 5 (4.7%), and type 3 (4.0%), with the least common being type 6 (3.0%). A significant correlation (p<0.05) was observed between the types of soft palate and both the genders (Table 1). There was no case of type 6 velar noted in groups 2 and 6, while type 1 was the most prevalent type in all the age groups. There was a highly significant correlation (p<0.05) noted among various velar morphological types and all the six age groups (Table 2).
Table 1
Distribution and correlation of types of soft palate with gender
Table 2
Correlation of types of soft palate with age groups
The mean VL and PD were the shortest in type 3 and maximum in type 2 and type 4 soft palates, respectively. The mean VW was the shortest in type 4 and maximum in type 6, whereas the Need's ratio was noted to be the lowest in type 2 and the highest in type 5 velar morphology. The statistical analysis was done using a t-test (2-tailed), observing a highly significant correlation (p<0.05) between morphological types and variants of the soft palate (Table 3).
Table 3
Correlation of mean velar length, velar width, pharyngeal depth, and Need's ratio with morphological types of soft palate
The mean VL, VW, and PD were greater in males, while the Need's ratio was larger among females. All the variants were significantly correlated (p<0.05) with both the genders (Table 4).
Table 4
Correlation of mean velar length, velar width, pharyngeal depth, and Need's ratio with gender
A consistent increase in VL was noted with an increase in age, while the VW, PD, and Need's ratio showed an inconsistent pattern. The statistical analysis was done using a t-test (2-tailed), observing a highly significant correlation (p<0.05) between various age groups and variants of the soft palate (Table 5).
Table 5
Correlation of mean velar length, velar width, pharyngeal depth, and Need's ratio with age groups
Discussion
Cephalometric analysis is the most commonly used technique for evaluating velar and pharyngeal morphology. It is a relatively inexpensive method and provides a good assessment of the soft-tissue elements that define the soft palate and its surrounding structures. The nasopharyngeal morphometric measurements and configuration of adjacent structures can be defined in terms of their depth and height in the median sagittal plane on a lateral cephalogram. A digital radiographic technique is used as it enables the technician to take the image from the posterior to the anterior in the sagittal plane. Further, professional software is used to enhance and elicit the velar morphology by adjusting the contrast and for gradations.
In the present study, the type 1 (leaf shaped) soft palate was the most frequent type (48.7% cases), noted in our study samples, which was in accordance with the previous studies of You et al, Niu et al, and Kumar and Gopal.3 This type was previously described as classic velar morphology in the literature.13 Type 6 velar morphology was seen in only 3.0% cases and was not found in groups 2 and 6.
Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by the recurrent occlusion of the upper airways resulting due to the inspiratory collapse of pharyngeal walls during sleep., Pepin et al found that a 'hooked' morphology of the velum, which was described as 'S-shaped' in our study, indicated a high risk for obstructive sleep apnea in the awake patients. The hooking of the soft palate was defined as an angulation of 30° between the distal part of the uvula and the longitudinal axis of the velum. They hypothesized that soft palate hooking results in a sudden and major reduction in oropharyngeal dimensions, thus increasing the upper airway resistance and the transpharyngeal pressure gradient resulting in a pharyngeal collapse.16 The type 5 (S-shaped) soft palate was seen in 4.7% of the cases in the present study, while it was observed in 3.5% of the cases in the study of You et al and in 1.5% of the cases in Guttal et al's studies.13
In the present study, a significant increase in VL was noted with an increase in age. This was in accordance with the findings of Johnston and Richardson and Taylor et al, wherein the dimensional changes in the bony and soft tissues of oropharyngeal structures were assessed. Kollias and Krogstad showed that the increase in the velar length was equal among males and females, but in our study, it was noted to be significantly greater in males than in females. The velar length in type 3 was significantly shorter than that in the other five types, which was accordance with You et al's study. This might be due to the fact that with increasing age, VL increases and the velar features of some primary 'butt-like' (type 3) soft palates might gradually present as the other types, such as types 1 and 2, which show a longer VL.
The velopharyngeal closure is obtained by a normal apposition of the soft palate with the posterior and lateral pharyngeal walls, thus separating the oral cavity from the nasal cavity during deglutition and speech. When the velum, lateral, and posterior pharyngeal walls fail to separate the two cavities, VPI occurs. Nakamura et al reported that patients with persistent VPI had a shorter VL and greater PD, resulting in a lower value of the Need's ratio (PD/VL). The overall mean Need's ratio of 0.78 was reported in the present study, which was higher in females than in males. The results were in accordance with those of Guttal et al13 but contradictory to the results of Subtelny, Hoopes et al, and Simpson and Colton. According to Subtelny, a Need's ratio greater than 0.70 demonstrates the risk of VPI, while a lesser value may cause nasality of speech. A highly significant correlation was found between the Need's ratio and six variants of velar types (p<0.05), which was similar to the results of Wada et al, Praveen et al,16 and You et al. The mean VW, PD, and Need's ratio showed an inconsistent pattern with an increase in age in our study. This observation was in accordance with the findings of a study conducted by Guttal et al.13
Hence, the present study highlighted the variable radiographic appearances of the soft palate on lateral cephalograms with type 1 as a classic velar morphology. The statistical findings of pharyngeal morphology in this study might help in a better understanding of velopharyngeal closure and etiology of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Further, the morphological variation of the soft palate plays an important anatomic role in functional rehabilitation of speech, breathing, and hearing; and managing patients with a cleft lip/palate, enlarged adenoids, obstructive sleep apnea, poorly retained maxillary denture, or skeletal craniofacial malocclusion.
References
1. You M, Li X, Wang H, Zhang J, Wu H, Liu Y, et al. Morphological variety of the soft palate in normal individuals: a digital cephalometric study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:344–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Moore KL, Agur AM. Essential clinical anatomy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. [Google Scholar]
3. Kumar DK, Gopal KS. Morphological variants of soft palate in normal individuals: a digital cephalometric study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5:1310–1313.[Google Scholar]
4. Pepin JL, Veale D, Ferretti GR, Mayer P, Levy PA. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: hooked appearance of the soft palate in awake patients - cephalometric and CT findings. Radiology. 1999;210:163–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Subtelny JD. A Cephalometric study of the growth of the soft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1957;19:49–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. The influence of cephalometeric parameters on resonance of speech in cleft lip and palate patients. An interdisciplinary study. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62:202–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Akcam MO, Toygar TU, Wada T. Longitudinal investigation of soft palate and nasopharyngeal airway relations in different rotation types. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:521–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Mazaheri M, Krogman WM, Harding RL, Millard RT, Mehta S. Longitudinal analysis of growth of the soft palate and nasopharynx from six months to six years. Cleft Palate J. 1977;14:52–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Haapanen ML, Kalland M, Heliovaara A, Hukki J, Ranta R. Velopharyngeal function in cleft patients undergoing maxillary advancement. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997;49:42–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Simpson RK, Colton J. A cephalometric study of velar stretch in adolescent subjects. Cleft Palate J. 1980;17:40–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Taylor M, Hans MG, Strohl KP, Nelson S, Broadbent BH. Soft tissue growth of the oropharynx. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:393–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Niu YM, Wang H, Zheng Q, He X, Zhang J, Li XM, et al. Morphology of the soft palate in normal humans with digital cephalometry. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;24:321–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
![Roof of mouth purple and yellow Roof of mouth purple and yellow](http://scielo.isciii.es/img/revistas/medicorpa/v12n4/02.htm32.jpg)
13. Guttal KS, Breh R, Bhat R, Burde KN, Naikmasur VG. Diverse morphologies of soft palate in normal individuals: a cephalometric perspective. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2012;24:15–19.[Google Scholar]
14. Cohen SR, Chen L, Trotman CA, Burdi AR. Soft-palate myogenesis: a developmental field paradigm. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:441–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Maltais F, Carrier G, Cormier Y, Series F. Cephalometric measurements in snorers, non-snorers, and patients with sleep apnoea. Thorax. 1991;46:419–423.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Praveen BN, Amrutesh S, Pal S, Shubhasini AR, Vaseemuddin S. Various shapes of soft palate: a lateral cephalometric study. World J Dent. 2011;2:207–210.[Google Scholar]
17. Johnston CD, Richardson A. Cephalometric changes in adult pharyngeal morphology. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:357–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Kollias I, Krogstad O. Adult craniocervical and pharyngeal changes - a longitudinal cephalometric study between 22 and 42 years of age Part II Morphology of uvulo-glossopharyngeal changes. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:345–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Johns DF, Rohrich RJ, Awada M. Velopharyngeal incompetence: a guide for clinical evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1890–1898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Nakamura N, Ogata Y, Kunimitsu K, Suzuki A, Sasaguri M, Ohishi M. Velopharyngeal morphology of patients with persistent velopharyngeal incompetence following repushback surgery for cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40:612–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Hoopes JE, Dellon AL, Fabrikant JI, Edgerton MT, Jr, Soliman AH. Cineradiographic definition of the functional anatomy and apathophysiology of the velopharynx. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:443–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Wada T, Satoh K, Tachimura T, Tatsuta U. Comparison of nasopharyngeal growth between patients with clefts and noncleft controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:405–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Imaging Science in Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology